Clarify what the goal of the contribution is
This score specific scenario, some are about the project, some are about governance, there may be some are about research, the scenario is not the same, if it is a project, in the conceptualization stage should be clear by the conceptualizer after doing some research on specific issues, of course for the establishment of Conpetitive Product Analysis library, I think it can be expanded to form a specific board of Conpetitive Product Analysis library, and then as a separate idea can even develop into a proposal to apply, of course, there will also be LX points reward.
Sort out the problem areas that need to be contributed by the community
This is also what we are considering, which is similar to the bounty task, our thinking is two parts, the first part is about the bounty task of development, the second part is about the bounty task of research, we are collecting some development bounty task publicized to the community, of course, there are also corresponding points reward, points we will be publicized on notion at this stage.
Planning different contribution methods and rewards
I think this can be optimized on the basis of question 2, different contribution methods and rewards can be case by case, but the total amount of LX Points, as well as some basic rules of allocation and redemption, we will list soon.
Rewards should include project benefits and community benefits
Of course! If members are involved in the construction of a specific project, then naturally there are project benefits on top of community benefits, the first is that project members can receive LXP points and U allocated to the project, and the second is that in the initial token economic map of LXDAO, a large proportion belongs to the community, as early participation in the community contribution and project contribution of community members, will be rewarded for early contributions, This is also the core value of LXDAO: sustainability!
Further breakdown of communication according to issues or tasks
This is indeed should be based on different contribution stages or key issues to initiate ad hoc special discussions and well documented, should be the specific project responsible for the PM to implement this matter, such as meeting minutes, weekly reports, proof of workload, etc., for example, the weekly report of the governance team content. https://www.notion.so/lxdao/Meeting-Notes-54959b2262844475973c86e743be78c5
Weekly reports, meeting notes, POW certificates, etc. will record the contribution value of specific members, which is one of the important bases for later reference.
Finally, thanks to Dyson’s suggestion, LXDAO buidler should be under the supervision of the community members, also welcome Dyson can carry out more in-depth discussion, let us together will LXDAO become more “conscience”.