Proposal: Governance Working Group for S11

TL;DR

The Governance Team, serving as the brain of LXDAO, needs to conduct clear and profound research and insights on the community’s long-term planning, roadmap, and narrative. By exploring minimal and automated governance, the team aims to continuously optimize governance efficiency, thereby enhancing the overall experience of community members.

During the previous S10 cycle, the Governance Team optimized the community meeting system, governance voting mechanisms, and implemented multiple governance SOPs to promote minimal governance. It also refined the process for forming virtual teams and project initiation, revamped the Handbook, and further advanced the community incentive system.

In S11, the Governance Team will continue to promote minimal governance and gradually transition towards automation. It will refine narrative discussions, complete the Handbook revision, and maintain active observation and participation in international ecosystem governance.

The Governance Team will request a total budget of 16,800 LXPU from the community for S11.

S10 Governance Work Review

What We Did in S10

  • Collaborate with Unco to host a Narrative Brutality Co-Learning session, fostering a community atmosphere of narrative discussions.
  • Advance the LXDAO governance roadmap and update the Handbook accordingly.
  • Enhance participation in international ecosystem governance by introducing a Governance Observation Weekly Report during weekly meetings, encouraging community discussions on governance.
  • Optimize the initiation process and classification system for virtual teams and projects. Develop a transparent and comprehensive governance system for applications, voting, sub-treasuries, and disclosures.
  • Minimal Governance: Streamline governance processes such as accounting, multi-treasury management, and salary disbursement, with the Governance Team responsible for statistics, public reporting, and disbursement.
  • Community Incentive Plan: Implement retrospective incentives for the community and early contributor incentive systems.

Areas for Improvement

  • The community’s governance engagement has significantly declined, with lower voter turnout.
  • Observations of external international ecosystem governance events remain insufficient.

S11 Main Work Plan

Core Work

Foster an active governance atmosphere, enhance international governance observation, continuously strengthen narrative development, refine the governance roadmap, and consistently advance minimal governance practices.

Specific Tasks

  • Improve the Governance Team’s collaboration efficiency with other working groups. Adjust the responsibilities of community governance staff by transferring some liaison and administrative tasks to a governance atmosphere role. Strengthen the coordinator role to consolidate weekly updates from working groups and provide coordination suggestions.
  • Explore the implementation of the next phase of early contributor incentive mechanisms, including discussions and proposals for token mechanism planning.
  • Enhance participation in international ecosystem governance, expand international influence, and focus on exploring solutions for issues such as “incentives, sense of belonging, and governance apathy.”
  • Continue updating the Handbook and exploring narrative development.
  • Further advance minimal governance by exploring more automation possibilities based on S10 community governance SOPs. Implement improvements in payroll automation and voting rights mechanisms.
  • Promote the full participation system and proposal review process. Facilitate the “expert invitation” initiative to assist in proposal planning, initially implementing it in forums.
  • Increase the effectiveness of public disclosures related to proposals, voting, and treasury analysis.
  • Conduct governance experiments with a “goal-unlock rewards” system.
  • Advance the second phase of the Narrative Brutality Co-Learning initiative.

概要

治理小组作为 LXDAO 的大脑,需要针对社区的长期规划、路线图、叙事有较为明确和深刻的研究洞察。通过探索最小化、自动化的治理,持续优化社区的治理效率从而增加社区成员的整体体验。

在过去的 S10 中,治理小组优化了社区会议制,治理权投票机制,推行了多项治理 SOP 以推进社区最小化治理,完善虚拟小组及项目立项流程,对Handbook进行了改版,并进一步推动了社区的激励制度。

在 S11 中,治理小组将持续推行最小化治理并且逐渐向自动化过渡,完善叙事讨论,完成Handbook 改版,持续对国际生态治理观察和参与。

治理组将在 S11 向社区申请总共 16800 LXPU 的预算

S10 治理工作回顾

S10 我们做了什么

  • 联合 Unco 举办叙事残酷共学,并借此形成社区关于叙事讨论的氛围
  • 推动 LXDAO 治理路线图,进行对 Handbook 的更新
  • 增加国际生态治理参与,在周会上增加治理观察周报,形成社区对于治理的讨论;
  • 优化虚拟小组/项目的立项流程及项目分级,针对申请、投票、子国库、披露形成透明公开的完善治理·制度
  • 最小化治理: 优化会计、 多国库管理、 发工资等治理流程,由治理组进行统计、公示、发放
  • 社区激励方案: 将社区回溯性激励和早期贡献者激励制度落地实践

不足事项

  • 社区治理氛围明显减少,投票率降低
  • 对于外部国际生态的治理事件观察依然不足

S11 主线工作规划

核心工作

活跃治理气氛,提高国际治理观察,持续强化叙事,完善治理路线图,持续推进最小化治理。

具体工作

  • 提高治理组对其他工作组协作效益,社区治理员工作进行调整,部分联系及行政工作转移到治理氛围岗,并加强协调员的角色,对各工作组每周状况进行汇总,并提出协调建议
  • 探索新一阶段的早期贡献者激励制度落地实践,包含代币机制规划的讨论及提案,
  • 提高国际生态治理参与,扩增国际影响力,并着重在「激励,归属感,治理冷漠」等议题的解决方案探索,上季治理报告的完善,输出,应用。
  • 持续完善 Handbook 的更新及叙事探索
  • 继续推进治理最小化,在 S10 社区治理 SOP 的基础上探索更多向自动化过渡的可能,落实完善工资自动化以及投票权机制
  • 促进全员参与制及提案审议流程运作,推进「专家邀请」来协助提案的规划,初步落实在论坛上。
  • 提高提案,投票,国库分析等信息公开披露的效益
  • 进行「目标解锁奖励」制度的治理实验
  • 推进叙事残酷共学第二期

预算规划

在 S11,我们将设立 2名 固定岗成员 和 1名 实习成员

Post Duty Worktime Amount Wage Budget/month
PM 持续推动 S11 激活计划
• 完成 LXDAO Handbook 的更新; 主持治理相关会议; 协调治理组成员工作; 完成社区立项及跟踪流程 20 H/week 1 20 LXPU/h 1600
治理研究员 踪和分析国际各类生态的治理事件,能够独立产出分析报告,协助推进 LXDAO 的核心协议和治理路线图。 12-20 H/week 1 15 LXPU/h 1200
社区治理员 对社区季度核心路线图负责,参与各工作组的周会,管理核心事项进度及进行协调。维护 LXDAO 的对外展示,及时更新社区最新情况,撰写社区周报,主持社区周会,推动社区的高效协作(SOP) 12-20 H/week 1 15 LXPU/h 1200
治理组实习岗 对社区氛围负责,负责活跃社区社群、引导新人、加强社区话题讨论。 12-20 H/week 1 7.5 LXPU/h 600
治理类 Bounty 投票权机制,官网维护,审议专家邀请 1500
研究类 Bounty 对新治理制度效益等调查分析,残酷共学第二期 500
Total/season 19800 6600
1 Like

针对这一块,希望大家可以提出建议目前适合实验「目标解锁奖励」的规划

1 Like

或许可以用 MyFirstMeme 做个最小实验?
目前的“目标解锁奖励”是口头的:
一个大家满意的 Demo,来解锁 20h 的 forge 组 bounty(10 lxpu/h)

然后这个项目若是继续推进,则继续开展更多的“目标解锁奖励”实验,来探索冷启动项目的可能性,降低启动新项目的流程/成本/难度。

1 Like

嗯,不过不能只是一刀切有没有达标,有几种可能:

  • 多维度评分决定解锁多少
  • 评分百分比解锁多少
  • 多阶段解锁

可以简单提出一些构想

以下链接为建议及构想的notion页面:

1 Like

请问一下,实习岗还缺人吗? :face_with_peeking_eye:

所有岗位已经在昨天招募结束了

1 Like