TL;DR
To enhance community participation and the proposal review process, this proposal suggests introducing an expert review mechanism. This includes inviting experienced community members and external experts to assist in proposal planning and review, thereby improving the quality and efficiency of community proposals.
Proposal Description
Background and Objectives
The current community proposal process may lack professional review during the transition from idea to formal proposal, resulting in inconsistent proposal quality and execution inefficiencies. This proposal aims to add an expert review mechanism to the existing process, particularly for project initiation and governance proposals. By inviting experienced community members and external industry experts, the mechanism seeks to enhance proposal recognition, discussion depth, and community engagement.
Advantages of the Expert Review Mechanism
-
Enhancing Proposal Recognition
Expert opinions help community members better understand proposals, improving the quality and depth of discussions.
-
Optimizing Proposal Quality
Experienced members bring community knowledge and values to focus proposals more closely on LXDAO’s objectives, reducing ineffective proposals. External experts offer unique perspectives and industry insights to further refine proposals.
-
Strengthening Community Credibility
External experts with established industry reputations can lend credibility to LXDAO by participating in proposal reviews, enhancing the DAO’s brand influence and proposal trustworthiness.
Process Optimization
Current Process:
- Propose an idea in the forum → Consolidate community consensus → Submit a formal proposal
Enhanced Process:
- Propose an idea in the forum → Community suggests inviting external experts → BD invites external experts → Form a proposal review group
- Review Meetings: Conduct in-depth discussions, exchange opinions, and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the proposal.
- Proposal Formation: The proposer consolidates review outcomes and posts the proposal in the forum. Experts provide specific suggestions and feedback.
- After gathering and refining community consensus, the proposal enters the formal proposal stage.
Responsibilities of Experts
- Provide constructive suggestions to proposers.
- Share personal insights and clarifications on proposals.
Criteria for Inviting Experts
- Community Recommendations: When an idea is proposed in the forum, community members can recommend whether to invite experts and vote on the associated budget.
- BD Invitation: After community approval, BD will invite experts based on the proposed list.
- Invitation Principles:
- External experts recognized by the community can be prioritized for collaboration.
- If the initial invitation fails, alternate experts can be nominated.
- A single expert is not recommended to review more than one proposal simultaneously.
Internal Invitations Based on Proposal Types
- Project Initiation Proposals: Requires assistance from Forge members for review.
- Governance Proposals: Governance or Forge members can assist if needed.
- Other Proposals: Expert review may be introduced as required.
Expert Incentives
- Internal Experts: Review work is credited to the working group’s PoC.
- External Experts: Incentives are allocated based on the proposal budget, with mechanisms approved through community voting.
Treasury Expenditures and Revenue Distribution
- Budget Requirements:
- Incentive costs for external experts
TL;DR
为促进全员参与制及提案审议流程运作，提议引入专家审议机制，包括社区资深成员和外部专家，协助提案的规划和审议，以提高社区提案质量和执行效率。
Proposal Description
背景与目标
当前社区提案流程从想法到提案的转化中，可能缺乏专业性审议，导致提案质量参差不齐、执行效率较低。本提案建议在现有流程基础上，增设专家审议机制，尤其针对立项提案和治理提案。通过邀请社区资深成员及外部行业专家，协助审议提案，提升提案认知度、讨论深度和社区参与度。
专家审议机制的优势
-
提升提案认知度
专家意见能够帮助社区成员更深入理解提案，提高社区讨论的质量和深度。
-
优化提案质量
资深成员结合社区经验和价值观，能更好地对焦提案与LXDAO的关联性，减少无效提案。外部专家提供独特视角和产业洞见，进一步优化提案。
-
增强社区背书
外部专家通常具备一定行业声誉，其参与审议有助于增强LXDAO的品牌影响力和提案可信度。
流程优化
当前流程：
- 在论坛提出想法 → 汇总论坛共识 → 提案
新增流程：
- 在论坛提出想法 → 社区建议邀请外部专家 → 由BD邀请外部专家 → 组成提案审议小组
- 审议会议：深入讨论议题，交换意见，评估提案方案的优缺点。
- 形成提案：提案人汇整审议结果，在论坛发出提案，专家提供具体意见和建议。
- 在论坛达成共识并修正后进入正式提案流程。
专家职责
- 向提案人提供建设性建议
- 针对提案内容提出个人意见及说明
专家邀请条件
- 社区提议：在论坛发起提案想法时，社区成员可建议是否需要邀请专家，并对相关预算进行投票。
- BD负责邀请：投票通过后，由BD根据提议名单进行邀请。
- 邀请原则：
- 外部专家被社区认可后，可列为优先合作对象。
- 如果首次邀请失败，可进行备选专家提名。
- 同一专家不建议同时审议两个提案。
根据提案分类的内部邀请
- 立项提案：需邀请Forge成员协助审议。
- 治理提案：如有需求，可邀请治理或Forge成员协助审议。
- 其他提案：可根据需要选择是否引入审议机制。
专家激励
- 社区内部专家：审议工作计入工作组PoC。
- 外部专家：根据提案预算进行激励发放，激励机制由社区投票通过。
Treasury Expenditures and Revenue Distribution
- 预算需求：
- 专家激励费用（外部专家）