LXP should be ERC20 SBT tokens?

Hi guys, previously, I was thinking of using IPFS and Database for recording LXP, but it can only be allocated to our builders. But some of the LXDAO contributors might not be LXDAO Buidlers, and it seems ERC20 SBT tokens are more suitable for this case. (Easy to track, just need to pay some gas fee)

Let’s have a soft vote, and if we think ERC20 is a good idea, we can start designing our Points contract and make a proposal.

  • ERC20 Token on Ethereum cannot be transferred as they are Points
  • Recorded in DB of LXDAO and synced to IPFS, and attached to the Buidler Card
  • Other better solutions

0 voters

  1. 有 token,就不需要ipfs上的积分字段了
  2. 不可转移最好是限定转移,这样给以后对积分兑换之类的一定的发挥空间,例如每个地址都可以和官方地址互相 transfer,而不需要通过 owner 才能发放 token,当然官方地址需要由多签管理。又例如之后有一个兑换合约,可以接受用户发送的积分,返回比例的新 token。

按照这种场景设想,其实设定一个 transfer 的白名单即可,白名单的地址可以接受和发送token,白名单只有官方地址和未来的兑换合约地址,不会加其他地址。

1 Like
  1. Yeah, the token is used for replacing the IPFS data, if we choose the token, we don’t need the LXP on IPFS anymore
  2. Good point, we can do that.

In my option, the LXDAO SBT token on the chain is used to record history and reward, which swap LXDAO tokens in the future.

Very interested in the Token contract development.

1 Like

Seems you are talking about the first solution. ERC20 Token on Ethereum?

If we use ERC20, we might need to remove the LXPoints in this contract https://github.com/lxdao-official/lxdao-buidlers-sbt

SBT的作用是提升非信任环境下的协作效率,如果已经互信则无用。SBT是一个用来衡量信用质量的口袋。它有两个衡量方式:有多重(积分数量)&有啥用(身份标签)。比如builder应该是SBT其中的一个身份标签,同时还应该有其它不同的身份标签,不同身份标签可以根据积分规则来获取。

只有统一在一个SBT体系下,SBT才能起到对内激励与对外影响力互相促进的效果。建议考虑统一处理,拓展SBT身份属性,并将积分纳入其中,而非单独规划。这样SBT才能作为一个完整的资产来表达LXDAO的影响力,才能随着LXDAO成长带来更多外部加持,才能对Contributor有激励作用,否则意义不大。

主要是积分这个定义有点问题,之前的设计就是 SBT 上面的身份属性,但是可编程性很差,而且必须要有 SBT 才可以。有一些外部贡献者其实并没有 SBT,但是也有贡献值得分配一些积分。借鉴 SeeDAO 的做法,将其做成了 SBT Token。