Problems I experienced in multiple DAOs and tried to solve via dao3.ai:
- We’ve heard much news about DAO management team rugged the community, even with a multi-sig controlled treasury.
- From my experience, a lot of DAOs don’t use modern management tools like OKRs to track the goal of the DAO, a lot of resources have been wasted, and it’s hard to monitor the performance of the DAO management team.
- Some DAOs have the issue of nepotism, and the community can do nothing to change the situation.
Solution:
- Fully on-chain managed dao treasury via voting to avoid hard rug;
- Use modern management tools like OKR to make the DAO on the right track to achieving something.
- DAO token holders can challenge/change DAO management members so that the DAO can keep vitality and avoid ossification(soft rug).
I’ve built a prototype on Sui testnet to demo this idea, if you are interested in this idea, please comment on this thread.
我在多个 DAO 中遇到的并试图通过dao3.ai解决的问题:
- 我们听到过很多DAO管理团队把国库资金卷款跑路的新闻,有一些还是多签控制的国库。
- 从我的经验来看,许多DAO没有使用像 OKR 这样的现代管理工具来跟踪 DAO 的目标,导致大量资源被浪费,并且很难对 DAO 管理成员进行绩效考核。
- 一些 DAO 存在裙带关系问题,而社区无法改变这种能力无法匹配岗位角色的情况。
解决方案:
- 通过投票管理由智能合约控制的 DAO 国库,避免卷款跑路;
- 使用现代管理工具,如OKR,避免 DAO 跑偏,也方便绩效考核。
- DAO 代币持有人可以通过提案挑战/更改 DAO 管理成员,使DAO保持活力,避免组织僵化和软性死亡。
我在 Sui 测试网上创建了一个原型来演示这个想法,如果你对这个想法感兴趣,欢迎在这个帖子下评论。
PPT: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/13Rln0BR6Bww-P66JFPYOmWRbYTJVyA2xE3WTA71VpBM/edit?usp=sharing