1. 当我们在聊 Coordination 的时候，我们到底在聊什么？
协调定义
协调是大批参与者为了同一目标而去共同努力的方式。协调是一个极度广泛的行为，在日常生活中，小到朋友之间决定今晚去哪间饭店，大到国家之间的决策，都是一种协调的表现。协调是宇宙中最强大的力量，良好的协调能让人们共同团结起来，促成一项伟大事业的达成。
好的协调能促使一些伟大事业的诞生，如不同部门关于疾病药物的研发，为广大人群提供基础救济服务，坏的协调能让稳定的秩序变得动乱，如俄乌战争，部分人因为利益不和，而发起的国与国之间的战争，让很多人因此失去了生命，又如，韩国政府近期发生的动乱，这种内部不和、集体决策的协调失效，更是导致社会分裂与信任危机的重要因素
协调的反义词
协调的反义词是不合理的协调，我们常常把这种行为形容为‘勾结’，比较危险的协调是即一个人只与一小撮人协调，而不与其他人协调，从而导致陷入深渊，如小圈子贿选，一小搓人商量某种利于小团体的利益，从而损害的是更广大人的利益，我们常常把这种结果形容为‘勾结’
区块链里面的协调有哪些
1. 人与人之间的协调：共事
当你在和你的同事共事的过程中，也会有很多协调问题。团队成员如何确定工作量，一个团队里面的不同职位如何协调工作，人员之间通过某种机制共同商定一件事情，这部分协调为人与人之间的协调，包括治理、共事、分配等。
在区块链的世界中的一些协调工具
- Coordinape：基于赞赏行为给贡献者奖励的协议，适合去中心化团队。
- CharmVerse：建立关系和共同创建项目的管理工具，帮助团队成员同步任务和进展。
- FairSharing：链上贡献分配协议，可以用透明且无需信任的方式分配奖励。
2. 社区与社区之间的协调：合作
一个团体和另一个团体之间进行交涉时，也会有一些协调问题，例如不同的社区之间如何合作，如何确定同一目标，如何共同举办一个黑客松等。合作的目标通常是通过联合资源、共享经验或解决共同的问题来实现双赢。
一些区块链领域的协调案例
- 黑客松合作：Gitcoin 常常举办跨社区的黑客松，鼓励不同社区的人才共享知识和资源。
- 联合治理协议：如协议间的联合提案（例如多链 DAO 投票），让社区之间的合作更高效。
3. 链与链之间的协调：跨链
链与链之间的协调也是一种协调方式，不同的链之间如何使用同一套跨链标准，链与链之间的信息如何传输，以及链与链之间如何具有更好的互操作性。
- 以太坊互操作论坛（EIF）：今年的 Devcon 期间发生了一件具有里程碑意义的事件——以太坊互操作论坛(EIF)。这次聚会汇集了整个以太坊生态系统的关键参与者，他们抛开竞争，专注于共同的使命：让以太坊真正具有互操作性。
协调的核心是明确、透明与共识
无论是人与人之间的协调、社区之间的合作，还是链与链之间的互操作，协调的本质在于建立明确的目标、透明的机制和达成广泛的共识。通过合适的工具和方法，协调不仅可以降低摩擦成本，还能为各方创造更大的价值。
如何定义一个协调标准
协调的核心是明确，透明与共识, 虽然我们无法定义统一的协调标准，但是有一些路径是我们可以去逐步实现一个协调标准虽然我们无法定义统一的协调标准，但可以通过以下路径逐步实现：
- 透明的治理: 确保决策过程公开可见，增强参与者信任。使用一些工具如 Snapshot、CharmVerse 实现链上治理，提高透明度。
- 合理的资源分配: 基于贡献或需求分配资源，避免资源浪费和不公平。如应用 Coordinape、FairSharing 等工具，提供数据驱动的分配机制。
- 有效的反馈：建立清晰的反馈通道，让每个成员了解其工作对整体的影响。使用工具（如Discord、治理论坛）进行公开讨论并优化决策。
协调过程中难免遇见冲突
协调的反义词是“不合理的协调”，我们通常将其称为“勾结”，即一小撮人联合起来决策，做出有损于更大群体利益的行为。这种情况在协调失败时容易发生。
在现实中，不同的人或群体具有不同的判断标准，因此协调过程中难免会遇到冲突。面对冲突时，我们需要通过以下方式解决问题：
建立共同标准: 建立清晰的流程，减少主观判断带来的分歧
倾听与协商: 让所有利益相关者充分表达自己的意见，通过讨论找到双方的平衡点
最后的选择：分叉
- 当冲突无法通过协调解决，区块链世界中提供了“分叉”这一独特机制，分叉允许分歧双方各自遵循自己的愿景，避免妥协导致的持续对立。
如 The DAO 事件在遭遇黑客攻击后，社区对于如何应对产生分歧。一部分人选择回滚链数据，最终形成以太坊（Ethereum）；另一部分人坚持链不可篡改的原则，延续了以太坊经典（Ethereum Classic）。
Steem 与 Hive 的分叉孙宇晨收购 Steem 社区引发了治理危机，部分社区成员对新管理层不满，最终选择分叉，创建了 Hive 社区。
不同的生态具有不同的协调文化
值得有意思的是，文化角度也是一个社区协调的重要考虑因素，类似以太坊和比特币社区
Bitcoin 的协调方式
- 任何人可以加入，也可以随时退出
- 如果不同意现在 Bitcoin 的现状，你可以修改客户端分叉出去
- 如果不同意某个升级，可以不升级 client，你依然还在 Bitcoin 网络
Ethereum 的协调方式
- 任何人可以加入，也可以随时退出，但需要同意 Ethereum 的 roadmap
- 如果你不同意 Ethereum 的现状，可以修改客户端分叉出去
- 如果不同意某个升级，不升级 client，那么就会被踢出网络，不能继续在 Ethereum 网络
在我们与 ChatGPT 对话的时候，我们可以明显发现比特币和以太坊社区的差距
- 以太坊社区：穿着未来感强烈的多彩服饰，与高科技互动，体现了开放、合作和创新精神。
- 比特币社区：身穿简约实用的衣服，站在一座古老的堡垒中，表现出坚韧、专注和对稳定的承诺。
以太坊更倾向于通过开放讨论和技术创新解决问题，吸引多样化的参与者。比特币则更关注维护现有规则的完整性，避免过多变动。
从比特币和以太坊的对比中可以看出，不同文化背景下的社区选择了符合自身目标与价值观的协调方式
- 比特币的规则简洁且坚固，适合长期价值存储的生态。
- 以太坊的灵活性与创新性，使其成为技术实验与应用发展的理想平台。
Reference
1. When we talk about Coordination, what are we really talking about?
Definition of Coordination
Coordination refers to the process by which a large number of participants collaborate toward a shared goal. It is an exceptionally broad concept, encompassing everyday activities such as friends deciding on a restaurant for dinner to large-scale decisions between nations. Coordination is one of the most powerful forces in the universe; effective coordination enables people to unite and achieve remarkable goals.
Good coordination can lead to the birth of great achievements, such as the collaborative development of life-saving medications or the provision of basic relief services to large populations. However, poor coordination can lead to chaos and instability. For instance, the Russia-Ukraine war exemplifies how a lack of consensus and conflicting interests between nations has resulted in devastating human and economic consequences. Similarly, recent governmental unrest in South Korea highlights how internal discord and failed collective decision-making have contributed to social division and a crisis of trust.
The Opposite of Coordination
The opposite of coordination is “collusion.” Collusion occurs when a person coordinates only with a small group for exclusive benefit, neglecting the broader collective, often leading to harmful outcomes. Examples include small-group election fraud or private agreements that prioritize the interests of a few at the expense of the majority. This negative form of coordination often undermines trust and equity within larger systems.
Forms of Coordination in Blockchain
1. Coordination Between Individuals: Collaboration
In professional or team environments, coordination often involves resolving issues such as workload allocation, defining roles, and establishing mechanisms for joint decision-making. This type of coordination covers governance, collaboration, and resource allocation between individuals.
Blockchain-Based Coordination Tools:
- Coordinape: A protocol for rewarding contributors based on peer appreciation, ideal for decentralized teams.
- CharmVerse: A management tool for building relationships and co-creating projects, enabling task and progress synchronization among team members.
- FairSharing: An on-chain contribution distribution protocol that allocates rewards transparently and trustlessly.
2. Coordination Between Communities: Cooperation
When one group interacts with another, coordination often involves questions of cooperation, such as how communities collaborate, align goals, and co-host events like hackathons. Cooperation typically aims to achieve mutual benefits by pooling resources, sharing expertise, or addressing common challenges.
Examples of Blockchain Coordination:
- Hackathon Collaboration: Gitcoin frequently organizes cross-community hackathons to encourage knowledge-sharing and resource pooling.
- Joint Governance Proposals: Multi-chain DAO voting enables efficient collaboration between communities.
3. Coordination Between Blockchains: Cross-Chain Interoperability
Coordination between blockchains involves adopting shared standards, transmitting information seamlessly, and improving interoperability.
- Ethereum Interoperability Forum (EIF): A milestone event at this year’s Devcon where key participants from the Ethereum ecosystem set aside competition to focus on their shared mission: achieving true interoperability for Ethereum.
Core Principles of Coordination: Clarity, Transparency, and Consensus
Whether among individuals, communities, or blockchains, the essence of coordination lies in establishing clear goals, transparent mechanisms, and broad consensus. By leveraging appropriate tools and methods, coordination can reduce friction and create greater value for all parties involved.
Establishing Standards for Coordination
The essence of coordination lies in clarity, transparency, and consensus. While a universal standard for coordination may not exist, the following steps can help establish effective standards:
- Transparent Governance: Ensure decision-making processes are visible and instill trust among participants. Tools like Snapshot and CharmVerse facilitate on-chain governance to enhance transparency.
- Fair Resource Allocation: Distribute resources based on contribution or need to avoid waste and inequality. Tools such as Coordinape and FairSharing offer data-driven allocation mechanisms.
- Effective Feedback: Create clear channels for feedback to help members understand their impact on the whole. Tools like Discord and governance forums facilitate open discussions and decision-making optimization.
Addressing Conflicts in Coordination
The antithesis of effective coordination is unreasonable coordination, often termed collusion—a scenario where a small group prioritizes its own interests at the expense of the majority. Such failures in coordination are common causes of conflict.
In reality, differing perspectives make conflict unavoidable in coordination processes. To address conflicts, consider the following approaches:
- Establish Shared Standards: Clear procedures reduce disagreements stemming from subjective judgments.
- Listen and Negotiate: Allow all stakeholders to voice their opinions and find a balanced solution through dialogue.
- The Ultimate Option: Forking
- When conflicts cannot be resolved through coordination, blockchain systems provide a unique mechanism: forking. Forking allows diverging parties to pursue their visions independently, avoiding prolonged confrontation.
Examples:
- The DAO Incident: After a hack, the Ethereum community split into Ethereum (ETH) and Ethereum Classic (ETC) based on differing values around immutability and rollback decisions.
- Steem vs. Hive Fork: Discontent with new management under Justin Sun led part of the Steem community to fork and create Hive.
Different Cultures of Coordination in Ecosystems
Cultural differences significantly influence coordination approaches within blockchain ecosystems, as seen in the Bitcoin and Ethereum communities.
Bitcoin’s Coordination Approach:
- Anyone can join or leave at any time.
- If dissatisfied with Bitcoin’s current state, one can modify the client and fork.
- If disagreeing with an upgrade, one can refrain from upgrading and remain in the Bitcoin network.
Ethereum’s Coordination Approach:
- Anyone can join or leave but must agree with Ethereum’s roadmap.
- If dissatisfied with Ethereum’s current state, one can modify the client and fork.
- If disagreeing with an upgrade, refusing to upgrade results in exclusion from the Ethereum network.
Through these differences, we observe contrasting coordination cultures:
- Ethereum’s Community: Embodies openness, collaboration, and innovation, represented by futuristic attire and interactions with cutting-edge technology.
- Bitcoin’s Community: Reflects resilience, focus, and a commitment to stability, represented by practical clothing and a fortress-like environment.
These cultural distinctions shape how each ecosystem approaches coordination and governance.
Ethereum tends to address challenges through open discussions and technological innovation, attracting a diverse range of participants. Bitcoin, on the other hand, focuses on preserving the integrity of its existing rules, minimizing changes.
The contrast between Bitcoin and Ethereum highlights how communities with different cultural backgrounds adopt coordination methods aligned with their goals and values:
- Bitcoin’s simple and robust rules make it well-suited for an ecosystem centered on long-term value storage.
- Ethereum’s flexibility and emphasis on innovation position it as an ideal platform for technological experimentation and application development.